p.Family density

Based on Dr Calhoun’s experiment, it is safe to say that high population density will promote deviant social behaviour and if not well managed, may lead to extinction of specie.

This essay talks about family survival. I cannot remember for the world when the idea of one-man-one-wife was started. In that little island it was started sometime in 1965 when that little island took independence. The law was drafted by none other than the wife of the then controller.

This is an important mind-fuck. It caused the man to be no longer able to challenge the controller of the day. Every man will find the woman such a rare and limited commodity that he has to protect that one and only asset. This leads to deadly fights in pubs and watering holes. A simple stare may cost one’s life. The idea behind this is to make the guys so busy bickering among themselves that they no longer have time to challenge the rule of the controller. A very nice ploy, indeed. Meanwhile, the controller fucks his brain’s-out on every scrumptious gal.

By having only one-man-one-wife and the wife taking 50% of the assets if there is a fall-out, it will cause big problem for the guy. The guy simply can’t move.

If one will to observe carefully, the stronger alpha males are likely to sire more kids from multiple females. This is important for the survival of the human species. That is why gals expect the guy to be experienced and great-in-bed even before she sexes him. Why? She wants to have a good time, if possible great time. How can a guy give a gal a great time? Well, it must be earned through multiple experiences. That being said, it must therefore imply that the gal doesn’t mind a guy with multiple female partners provided he delivers his part of the bargain.

In the west, how do they solve this problem? The smarter and richer guys actually take out pre-nuptial agreements on the gal. In the event of a fall-put, the guy is made not too worse off.

I have a personal friend; he has reached a wise old age of 70 years old by now. I knew him eons ago when he was much younger. Over the course of 25 years to 70 years, he had 4 marriages with 3 divorces. I noticed he regularly divorced his current wife after siring 2 kids. And each time he remarried, he would take on a 25-year-old sweet young thing. He has a total of 8 kids. He is a very strong alpha male. In his hey days, he controlled the second largest food chain in his country and still owned a huge house in the heart of the largest city, with a very large swimming pool which he has great difficulty in opening out after the winter and of course many houses for rental income. In a way, he has circumvented his country’s rule of one-man-one-wife by having loads of pre-nuptial agreements and yet at the same time sired enough kids to continue his gene pool. Because he is still very rich, every Christmas gathering is in excess of 30-40 guests. He has a Russian origin.

This is only possible if one is given the space to do so.

On that little island, this is totally not possible. With every decreasing space, there is simply no chance to play the procreation game.

Family Planning

In the west, a new development has come about, I can’t remember when. There is now a possibility of common-law partnership without the angst. The kids sired from it enjoy the same privileges as any other ordinary kids. Many western couples have adopted this idea quite well. In Germany and Sweden alone, almost all are common-law partners.

Hence, based on Dr Calhoun’s experiment, a despot male can handle up to about 12 members of a group (females with babies) and lived a normal life. Therefore, an alpha male with his entire lifespan should have at least 3-8 female full partners, siring at least 1 kid per liaison.

If the guy is poor, then a liaison with 2 female partners is totally possible, siring at least 1 kid per coupling. This is important for genetic diversity.

If the guy is rich, then a liaison of at least 3-5 females is considered normal.

That being said, will the gal be slighted at this multiple partnership? Not at all, notice the number of gals that sexed the chief narcotic officer and chief transport officer. Wouldn’t these gals have self-dignity? Of cos, they simply wanted to sire the best gene pool for their next generation. It is a woman instinct and shall remain so for the survival of the human species.

Family Space

For the above to happen, there must be a family space plan. For each member of the family or new member, there must be a land size of 1 acre reserved for their use.

For example, the guy was to get a gal, give her 1 acre of land to play. When a kid is born, give the kid an acre too. When more kids are born (try to limit them to 2-3 per coupling), give them each an acre to play. Build each a cute house. That way, there will be no quarrel. No gal will fight over the guy’s power.

Teach each of them to fish, so that in the event of enforced poverty, he/she can still survive.

Wouldn’t each gal come to know of each other’s existence? There is no use hiding. Better be truthful from the onset. If you are not strong, don’t play this game. Marry and then divorce. You do have enough time. If you are deemed strong enough, then it doesn’t matter whether there is prior knowledge or not. It simply doesn’t matter in the case of a strong alpha male. Remembering always - honesty is your only true weapon of choice.

Try it! You will be surprised over the reaction from all parties.

When the time comes for one’s passing on, leave the main heirloom to the strongest kid, it doesn’t matter male or female, he/she has to be the strongest to manage the remaining empire.

Why 1 acre?

Although this was derived rather arbitrarily, I did use some measure. On a 1-acre land, one can easily build a 50-apartment low-rise block, with plenty of green left, on which the incumbent can collect rental income for the rest of his/her life. This will provide a baseline survival package for him/her to contemplate his/her next move. Even if he/she didn’t bother about the next move, this property could be passed on to his/her next-of-kin, with no stress. With suitable estate tax planning (it costs about 3-5 years of rental income), the property can be owned forever. As 1-acre is a good sized lot in/near the city, the possibility of multiple type of use is possible. Hence, the suggestion of 1-acre. Anything smaller, waste of time. Anything bigger, can’t afford.

Extreme anger

More often than not, some guys face extreme display of anger from the woman folks. This is simply because the gal doesn't feel justified in the guy's adventurism. In short, the guy is not rich enough to play this game. In that case, the guy has to do it sequentially; even for my Russian friend, he has to play that sequential process too. Some of his wives were directors of large listed companies and professor of a very good university. It was their superior gene pools that interest my friend.

Extreme anger stamped from the fact that the guy was not able to cater for each and every one of the woman folk. There is a resource allotment and compromise issue. This is an unhappy state of affair for the existing woman folks, hence, the ruckus.  Learn to play within one's ability. Then, you will be fine.

For the rare alpha male, it is always fun to see the woman folks fighting for the attention of the alpha male. This is indeed a rare honour. One that defines one's view of a perfect world.

A woman's perspective

Suffice to say that a woman would rather share an alpha male than to own that beta male and labour over his inadequacy.

Emotional scathing of the youngs

Boys are normally not too emotionally attached to the problems from improper bonding of the parents. Hence, supervision need not be too stringent. For gals, this issue is heavier. Extremely close supervision is recommended. But, not too close. They might end up as Annabel Chongs; still, balanced heavier treatment is recommended.